What's Your EQ (entrepreneurial quotient)?

Here's a quiz to determine your “entrepreneurial quotient.” My intent is to test a person's knowledge of entrepreneurship. However, scoring high doesn't mean you're the next Steve Jobs, and scoring low doesn't mean you're not. Some answers are debatable, so there will be many comments. #10, in particular, is tricky so read it very carefully.
If you'd like to take an online version, go here on the Tickle site:
http://snipurl.com/eqtest
1. Your company is creating a new software product. The lead programmer has just shown you a working prototype and has promised that it will be done in six months. You should assume that it will really be completed in:
a. 3 months
b. 6 months
c. 12 months
d. 18 months
e. Shortly after money runs out
2. When you’re starting a new company, you shouldn’t be afraid of polarizing people with a new product or service that flies in the face of convention.
a. True
b. False
3. Patents are the main way to make your company defensible and able to withstand the challenges of competitors.
a. True
b. False
4. The foundation of a successful brand is:
a. Effective marketing
b. Evangelistic customers
c. Extensive advertising
d. Attractive packaging
e. An excellent product or service
5. Ultimately, who positions a product or service—establishing how customers will come to view it?
a. The company that makes it.
b. The company’s advertising agency
c. The company’s PR firm
d. The customers themselves
e. The press, and industry analysts
6. If you want your company to be successful, it’s most important to strive for which objective?
a. To be the lowest cost producer
b. To be the best known brand
c. To be the most profitable company
d. To be the sole provider of something people really want
e. To have the largest customer base
7. When pitching potential investors, you should keep your presentation to how many slides?
a. 0-5
b. 10-15
c. 30-40
d. 1
e. 60
8. As long as the founders own more than half of the company, they control the company.
a. True
b. False
9. Pick the statement that means a venture capitalist isn’t interested in your business.
a. “You’re too early right now.”
b. “We don’t have expertise in that area.”
c. “If you find other investors, come back to us.”
d. “Come back to us after you’re shipped.”
e. All of the above.
10. Which part of a business plan is the most important?
a. The financial projections
b. The management biographies
c. The competitive analysis
d. The executive summary
e. The product description
11. More than anything, you don’t want your business model to be:
a. Specific
b. Simple
c. Unique
d. Scalable
e. Proven
12. Which of the following key assumptions do you have to test when starting a company?
a. Number of sales calls a salesperson can make
b. Conversion rate of prospects to customers
c. Length of sales cycle
d. Amount of technical support needed per unit sold
e. All of the above
13. A company that is bootstrapping should avoid which management practice?
a. Managing for cash flow, not profitability
b. Trying to recruit a “dream” management team of proven executives
c. Positioning against the industry leader
d. Building a bottom-up forecast
e. Collecting fast and paying slow
14. Many behemoth companies like Microsoft, General Electric, and 3M have broad and disparate product lines, but ironically started out with singular focus on one specific product.
a. True
b. False
15. You’ve just met with a key potential account. It could be a large sale and also bolster your company’s credibility in the industry. However, the account is afraid to do business with a “startup.” The best way to win them over is to:
a. Ask your world-famous venture capitalist investor to call the customer.
b. Arrange for the CEO of your company to meet with the buyer.
c. Offer to do a pilot implementation at a deep discount.
d. Tell the customer that you will contact them once your company is “proven” in the marketplace.
e. Have your mom provide a character reference for you.
16. In the first sixty seconds of a presentation, you should:
a. Furnish your biographical background
b. Establish the size of the market you are addressing
c. Provide a summary of your financial projections
d. Summarize the technical foundation of your product or service
e. Explain what your company does
17. What’s the most important factor to consider when selecting the first employees at a startup?
a. The candidate’s academic background
b. The candidate’s work experience
c. The candidate’s love of your product or service
d. The candidate’s willingness to work for stock options in lieu of salary
e. The candidate’s prior personal relationship with you
18. Why should you never offer stock to an employee in lieu of salary?
a. Doing so sets an implicit price for your stock.
b. It could take a long time to raise venture capital, so the employee might amass a large amount of stock.
c. This practice is prohibited by law.
d. A and B
e. A, B, and C
19. The purpose of providing an offer letter to a job candidate is to:
a. Establish a starting point for negotiation
b. Demonstrate that the company is serious about an offer
c. Confirm what both parties have already verbally agreed to
d. Create an audit trail for the human resource department
e. All of the above
20. The best reason to form a partnership is to:
a. Increase revenues or decrease costs
b. Get the attention of analysts
c. Garnering press coverage
d. Scare your competitors
e. Impress potential investors
21. The reason to put an “out clause” in a partnership agreement is
a. To enable you to get out of a bad deal
b. To make your lawyers happy
c. To enable both parties to work comfortably with each other
d. Because all agreements have “out clauses”
e. None of the above.
22. The CEO of your company just told you that he and the CEO of another company have agreed to a partnership. Your first task, as vp of strategic alliances, is to
a. Contact the PR firms of both organizations to coordinate the announcement
b. Contact the vp of marketing of both organizations to coordinate the announcement
c. Meet with the middle managers and individual contributors in your company who are going to have to make this partnership work
d. Thoroughly research the other company to determine how best to work with it
e. Begin drafting a rollout plan for the partnership
Answers
1. c; 2. a; 3. b; 4. e; 5. d; 6. d; 7. b; 8. b; 9. e; 10. d; 11. c; 12. e; 13. b; 14. a; 15. c; 16. e; 17. c; 18. d; 19. c; 20. a; 21. c; 22. c



Yes, great idea. I have to laugh at myself because many of the correct answers are things that I learned after my 1st startup ran out of money ;)
I guess I'll just have to apply them to the next business.
FYI - It would be great to put this up in a survey format that would provide an instant score.
Posted by: flatfeemlsmarketing | Jan 20, 2007 9:53:21 PM
Entrepreneurs are rare breed, they are not trained. This EQ brings to focus a challenging task of appointing set criteriums for entrepreneurship.
I practically condemn it....
Posted by: Dipo Tepede | Jun 7, 2006 6:55:12 AM
Great quiz! Every prospective entrepreneur should have to pass this with flying colours before getting their funding. :-)
Posted by: The Entrepreneur's Wife | May 18, 2006 6:13:17 PM
Ha Trung,
You're right! I'll fix. Thanks for catching this.
Guy
Posted by: Guy Kawasaki | Mar 30, 2006 8:32:38 AM
In question 13 (regarding the management practice that a bootstrapping company should avoid), the choice (a) should be changed to "managing for cash flow, not profitability"--to make it a wrong answer.
Posted by: Ha Trung | Mar 29, 2006 7:52:18 PM
Got all of them right but one! What do I get, Guy?
You said you gonna invest in my unique business model :)
P.S. Excellent post, always a pleasure to read your blog.
Posted by: Krasimir [FilmDailies.com] | Mar 27, 2006 11:35:55 AM
Guy, have you tried to take your own survey on Tickle? When I tried to sign in it said, "I'm sorry, we can't offer you this service". So I used bugmenot. After going through the entire survey (including one question disguised to look like it was from you but actually was a spam offer) it proceeded to hit me with page after page of "special offers". I couldn't figure out how to get past them, so I'll never know how I did on the test... and will never use tickle again. Thanks, Tickle.
Posted by: Dan | Mar 25, 2006 12:46:05 PM
Very cool test! I'm gradually learning about all of this as I go.
Posted by: Andrew | Mar 16, 2006 11:18:03 AM
Great test Guy, I only got a 69%. I must be less talented than the others around here, or just less knowledge of the process. I can rectify the lack of knowledge at least.
Not entirely sure the low cost producer is always the way to go, although in the tech world it tends to work. there is a huge demand for high quality products too, and a plan that involves competing around quality in some market segments may be very profitable.
Posted by: Mike S | Mar 13, 2006 8:37:59 AM
My wrongs...
1. c not b - you must be an optimist to be an entrepreneur! :)
4. b not e - having a great product won't stop a great second mover. Loyal customers and a unique business model will mean you can fight another day.
6. c not d - c'mon... now were being too optimistic! "Patient for growth, impatient for profit" is the way to success. C.M.C.
11. e not c - I guess I just can't stop at product innovation...
15. d not c - I will follow Geoff Moore's advice on this one. If their not ready, find a customer that is.
19. b not c - I can see the error in my ways.
21. a not c - believe me, people leave, partners sell. Keep an out.
... and I have paid for them.
Good test Guy, but as you say they are open to debate, which like everything in this world is context dependent.
Posted by: Burned | Mar 13, 2006 4:25:49 AM
Maybe this isn't the place for this but I'm one to show that who they use is actually hurting them... Tickle is worthless.
first it asks for my personal information, including my email addresses so they can send me the results.
second, I do fill it out with good information and I get
"Thank you for your interest in this Tickle service. Unfortunately, we cannot permit you access to this service. Our apologies for any inconvenience."
Is this a scam to collect email addresses? Is Guy part of this scheme? Since Tickle is a Monster-owned company, what are they really doing with my information?
Posted by: ..ak | Mar 12, 2006 4:14:40 PM
Guy, I agree with most of the test and it's very cool. However, I feel the answer to question #15 "to offer a deep discount" discredits the selling party some by saturating the market with a lower price. That will saturate the market with a lower price and the customer may expect you to continue with such a low cost implementation. In my experience, cutting your price only hurts a business and the marketplace
I would be interested to hear what your reasons for that answer were?
Posted by: Gabe | Mar 11, 2006 11:42:49 AM
for #6, shouldn't we assume there's always competition in any market,
so brand recognition is the long term goal to win the game? Mightbe I misunderstand the "sole provider" context here...
please advise.
Posted by: Clement Huang | Mar 11, 2006 10:56:52 AM
It turns out I scored highest in currency arbitrage...and I thought I might have done better in portfolio management theory...who would have thought?
Posted by: George Soros | Mar 11, 2006 10:31:34 AM
Jeremy E.,
(on your disagreement with # 15)
I think you're right to urge caution -- organizations try to sucker freebies out of start-ups, but that should affect the continual assessment of whether the prospect is indeed a "key potential" client.
In any such negotiation, both parties must get "equal value" from the transaction. If I give you a freebie pilot, I should be aware of what I just cost myself and be able to put that cost against something I'm gaining (access to brand or something) ... something that I value. If we cannot craft such an equitable deal, then one of us is indeed a sucker.
In short, if I'm being jipped, then I'm not working with a "key potential" client.
-h
Posted by: nhira | Mar 10, 2006 8:42:23 PM
hey guy -
re: #22, while i agree with your answer as an *eventual* step that needs to be done, before i spend time with my organization's middle mgmt i'd like to make sure i understand how the other company fits into the overall picture (and btw, if it doesn't i'd go back to my CEO and ask him why he cut a partnership deal that didn't make sense for us ;). after i'm clear on how it fits in with our company, only then would i spend time with the rest of my team.
so i'd say the "first" task is to make sure the deal makes sense, and that i understand it. *then* i'd got to middle mgmt & get my team behind it & deliver.
- dave mcclure
www.SimplyHired.com
Posted by: DaveMc500Hats | Mar 10, 2006 7:28:34 PM
Tickle sucks! They want my personal info so bad, that they refused to provide my score after I took the test, b/s i would not give an email address!
Score that a BIG FAT ZERO for TICKLE!!
btw, I got 19 of 22 correct and haven't seen the "S" tatoo glowing on my chest!!! :-)
Posted by: james haft | Mar 10, 2006 5:48:03 PM
In response to question # 6 - If you want your company to be successful, it’s most important to strive for which objective?
Jack Welch once said, "It takes three things; Customer Satisfaction, Employee Satisifaction and Cash Flow".
Posted by: Patrick | Mar 10, 2006 5:01:35 PM
I very much disagree with your answer to 15. If you offer a deep discount to one large customer, lots of bad things will happen. You will spend a disproportionate amount of time servicing what is probably your least profitable deal (or worse, your biggest loser). You will also be hurting your cash flow. And worst of all, after all that effort, you may not even get the larger deal after all, even if the product does everything it says it can, because they may not be able to convince their big company to do the deal.
For example, the large company that I work for just plain won't do deals with companies whose financials they don't like, but there is no way for me to know if the financials will be good enough until after I've selected the vendor and done the pilot.
I speak from experience here, being someone who works for one of those big companies that tries to take advantage of startups by offering them crappy deals for "pilot" programs. I always tell my friends I would never want to have to negotiate with our company lawyers.
Someone (I thought it was you) said, "Don't spend all of your time chasing the big fish." That is excellent advice. The big fish aren't always as great as they seem.
Posted by: Jeremy E | Mar 10, 2006 4:11:57 PM
I got a 77%, roughly a "C". But that won't dissuade me from bringing my service to market. Spot on blog entry GK.
Posted by: Stacy | Mar 10, 2006 12:51:05 PM
10 is the easiest one of all - if a person can't explain (clearly!) the business plan in a paragraph, than the plan isn't worth much.
After all, all business plans are subject to change, but changes must be subjected to a plan.
Posted by: Ronny Max | Mar 10, 2006 11:09:08 AM
Great list. I found the first question both amusing and sad. I'm afraid there are many 'e' realities but 'c' is certainly the average 2X factor for IT estimates.
Differences of opinion:
#15 - most startups would have the CEO at the meeting anyway. However, selling your first customer at a deep discount can be problematic as well, especially if there is an ongoing revenue component.
#21 - out clauses are good business which is why C is the right answer. BUT, you should never, ever, ever, never enter into a partnership where there is even an inkling of a business (not contract lawyer) thought that it might not work out. In other words, if you think at the time you sign there is a probability that you will use the out clause, walk away.
Posted by: Scott Case | Mar 10, 2006 9:29:59 AM
question 18 is tricky. In WA state you must pay minimum wage to non-officers. that would make d the right answer.
Posted by: Max | Mar 10, 2006 9:00:56 AM
I got every single question wrong. 0 out of 22.
Posted by: Harry Chong | Mar 10, 2006 8:52:30 AM
I just took the test and would disagree with one of answers. It's the question on whether to compensate an employee with just stock. You can properly balance your startup's interest this by having a vesting schedule, a cliff, and allowing a conditional pre-purchase of the stock at a very low valuation (when you start the company).
Posted by: Vivek | Mar 10, 2006 8:40:18 AM
If the development team is using Extreme Programming, the "working prototype" demoed every two week is a shippable/deployable product. You ship or deploy to end-users when it's got enough features, and your tracking of team "velocity" provides a calibrated estimate of how many features can be done in six months.
see "Introducing XP in a start-up"
http://www.agilealliance.org/articles/deiasrobertomugheddog/file
Posted by: keith ray | Mar 10, 2006 8:31:01 AM
21/22, the only one I got wrong was 16 which I disagree with. I think in the first 60 seconds you should introduce yourself and figure out what the people you're talking with are interested in so that you can present the rest of the pitch in a way that resonates with them.
Posted by: Alex Krupp | Mar 10, 2006 7:52:29 AM
Thanks to a generous gift of 'Art of the Start', I was able to answer nearly all of these correctly! Yes - it arrived safely, Guy - thanks again.
Posted by: Ric | Mar 10, 2006 7:05:27 AM
I got three wrong, so I think that makes it a 19/22, or an 86.
It seems very much like a test for your blog and book - if you've read them, you know the answers. :P
Interesting test, though.
Posted by: Doug Hanna | Mar 10, 2006 6:18:45 AM
I answered false to question 5 because the statement "[they] started out with singular focus on one specific product" wasn't in the least ironic. Self-evident and obvious, yes. But ironic?
I also found it truly strange that the test threw in an extra question which was an ad for DoubleYourDating. Was this deliberate? Is it a service you support or make money from?
Posted by: Glen Raphael | Mar 10, 2006 2:09:37 AM
This is awesome!
Not just to get a sense of your own EQ, but this is also a very good tool for those considering a partnership. It brings up a number of issues that are easy to forget when the euphoria of changing the world has impaired your judgement.
I especially love your options for # 15. How about another couple of bad ideas:
f. Spend more than 10 meetings trying to convince your customer with nothing new except for miniscule price reductions
g: Lay a guilt trip on them about the fact that if every customer felt this way, no start-up would be successful
-h
Posted by: Hira | Mar 10, 2006 2:07:42 AM
scored 69% or lower!
Posted by: WTJ | Mar 10, 2006 1:23:17 AM
Hi,
I have a query on question 13. Isn't it option C as bad as option B. If we bootstrap and simultaneously position against an industry leader, are we not becoming a prey to the mighty? Isn't it better to focus on a niche area, build business and then slowly expand?
Posted by: Shivp | Mar 10, 2006 12:41:20 AM
Talking about polarization I should tell you that the online test that you linked here sucks.Very sleazy marketing ! It inserted a question of dating in between
Posted by: Rajan | Mar 10, 2006 12:14:37 AM
Normally such Objective questions come with some guidelines indicating if you score in a certain range then you belong to this category etc. Since you published these questions why not publish those categories as well.
I scored 16/22
Posted by: Rajan | Mar 9, 2006 11:58:46 PM
wait, for 1, does b mean what you labeled as b, because there are two a's.
Posted by: Francisco Tolmasky | Mar 9, 2006 11:58:40 PM
I scored highest in sales. Great test
Posted by: Aaron | Mar 9, 2006 11:44:18 PM
Brilliant idea to test us Guy! Puts the reading of your blog into perspective.
I've been doing a part time virtual entrepreneurship course through reading blogs and learning from leaders online. This was a great way to see how I'm doing.
Posted by: Khurram | Mar 9, 2006 10:42:51 PM
Cool Test!!!
I'm a diligent little oriental, i scored highest in marketing.
Posted by: John Nguyen | Mar 9, 2006 10:03:27 PM